Tugal vs push-type planter

A comparative study in a tropical country

Authors

  • Johan Kim Sampoerna University
  • Elloh Nia Michelle Angella Sampoerna University
  • Alfred Juliant Susanto Sampoerna University
  • Kushendarsyah Saptaji Sampoerna University

Keywords:

labour efficiency, mechanized seeding, precision agriculture, smallholder farming, seed planters

Abstract

The application of appropriate planting technologies is crucial for improving smallholder agricultural productivity in tropical regions. The seed planting process affects crop yield, efficiency, and resource use. This study compares the performance of the traditional tugal planting method and the push-type planter to evaluate their suitability under tropical field conditions. This study conducted a comparative assessment focusing on four key parameters: labour efficiency, seed placement precision, soil adaptability, and economic feasibility. Data were collected through direct observation of plating rate, uniformity of seed spacing, adaptability across varying soil conditions, and the expense to smallholder farmers. The tugal method demonstrated advantages in terms of low cost, simplicity, and adaptability to diverse terrains. However, it was less efficient due to poor seed spacing uniformity and high labour requirements. Conversely, the push-type planter improves planting speed, seed distribution accuracy, and long-term labour savings. The weaknesses included the heavier weight, reduced effectiveness in uneven soils, and higher initial investment costs. The findings suggest that tugal is practical in resource-constrained environments, while push-type planters enhance efficiency and precision. The balance of technological benefits with socio-economic realities is crucial for guiding smallholder farmers in applying the appropriate planting technology in tropical agricultural systems.

References

Y. Li et al., “Seeding detection and distribution evaluation using the developed automatic maize seeding machine,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 220, p. 108872, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108872.

S. Menon, S. Adhikari, and J. Mondal, “An integrated machine learning approach delineates an entropic expansion mechanism for the binding of a small molecule to α-synuclein,” Elife, vol. 13, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97709.3.

B. Achmad et al., “Traditional Subsistence Farming of Smallholder Agroforestry Systems in Indonesia: A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 8631, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148631.

M. H. Saeidirad and S. Zarifneshat, “Effect of Planting Method and Soil Moisture on Efficiency of Potato Harvesters,” Agric. Mech. Syst. Res., vol. 19, no. 17, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/erams.2018.116259.1228.

A. Ansar, N. Nazaruddin, and A. D. Azis, “Design Development and Performance Evaluation of Two-Row Corn Seed Planter,” J. Tek. Pertan. Lampung (Journal Agric. Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, p. 979, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org//10.23960/jtep-Lv12i4.979-987.

F. Baudron, R. Nazare, and D. Matangi, “The role of mechanization in transformation of smallholder agriculture in Southern Africa,” in Transforming Agriculture in Southern Africa: Constraints, Technologies, Policies and Processes, 1st ed., R. A. Sikora, E. R. Terry, P. L. G. Vlek, and J. Chitja, Eds., London, 2019, ch. 17, pp. 152–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429401701.

Q. Lu, X. Du, and H. Qiu, “Adoption patterns and productivity impacts of agricultural mechanization services,” Agric. Econ., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 826–845, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12737.

T. Martial, M. Asaad, and I. Gunawan, “Rubber Plantation Smallholders’ Management Model in Traditional Farming Practices in North Sumatera, Indonesia,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 358–363, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230139.

A. Sharda, J. Fulton, S. Badua, T. Griffin, I. Ciampitti, and L. Haag, “Planter downforce technology for uniform seeding depth,” 2017, Kansas State University, Kansas.

C. M. Pareek, V. K. Tewari, and B. Nare, “A mechatronic seed metering control system for improving sowing uniformity of planters,” J. Eng. Res., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 808–819, Jun. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.041.

T. Daum, Agricultural mechanization and sustainable agrifood system transformation in the Global South. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2625en.

V. Marinoudi et al., “Adapting to the Agricultural Labor Market Shaped by Robotization,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 16, p. 7061, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167061.

D. Gurav and D. P. Kadam, “Advancements in agricultural automation: A comprehensive review of automatic seed sowing equipment,” Int. J. Agric. Ext. Soc. Dev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 616–620, Jan. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33545/26180723.2024.v7.i1h.265.

H. Herdiansyah, E. Antriyandarti, A. Rosyada, N. I. D. Arista, T. E. B. Soesilo, and N. Ernawati, “Evaluation of Conventional and Mechanization Methods towards Precision Agriculture in Indonesia,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 9592, Jun. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129592.

A. Iskandar Syah, W. Tri Handoko, M. Zainul Falah, R. Kurniawan, A. Hafid, and D. Dwi Prasetya, “Implementation of Smart Corn Planter (SCP) to Support Food Security in Agricultural Area Gondosuli Village Probolinggo Regency,” Bull. Community Engagem., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 136, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.51278/bce.v3i2.645.

X. Cao, Q. Wang, D. Xu, S. Huang, X. Wang, and L. Wang, “Design and Analysis of Pneumatic Downforce Regulating Device for No-Till Corn Planter,” Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1513, Sep. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101513.

K. Phasinam, T. Kassanuk, and M. Shabaz, “Applicability of Internet of Things in Smart Farming,” J. Food Qual., vol. 2022, pp. 1–7, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7692922.

A. Olufemi, O. Oluwafemi, V. Akinmade, and M. A. Abdulkadri, “Development and performance evaluation of a Maize Planter,” Int. J. Eng. Sci. Appl., vol. 4, no. 4, 2020.

L. Oliveira, B. Ortiz, R. Silva, and G. Pate, “Variability of the active hydraulic downforce system related to cotton seed depth and emergence,” in Precision agriculture ’21, Brill | Wageningen Academic, 2021, pp. 829–836. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-916-9_99.

A. F. Amalia, H. S. Rahayu, and Muchtar, “Performance Comparison of Corn Seed Planter and Tugal In Dry Land Sigi District Central Sulawesi,” J. Agritechno, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.70124/at.v13i2.356.

J. Van Loon, T. J. Krupnik, J. A. López-Gómez, J. Timsina, and B. Govaerts, “A Standard Methodology for Evaluation of Mechanical Maize Seed Meters for Smallholder Farmers Comparing Devices from Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and Asia,” Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1091, Jul. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081091.

B. Wijayanto and E. Puspitojati, “Optimizing Agricultural Mechanization to Enhance The Efficiency and Productivity of Farming In Indonesia: A Review,” AJARCDE (Asian J. Appl. Res. Community Dev. Empower., pp. 209–217, Sep. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v8i3.493.

H. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Wang, M. Ankrah Twumasi, and A. A. Chandio, “Impact of Agricultural Mechanization Level on Farmers’ Health Status in Western China: Analysis Based on CHARLS Data,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 4654, Mar. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054654.

K. Bazargani and T. Deemyad, “Automation’s Impact on Agriculture: Opportunities, Challenges, and Economic Effects,” Robotics, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 33, Feb. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13020033.

R. E. Tabal, R. M. C. Amongo, E. P. Quilloy, and E. K. Peralta, “Development of a single-row push type plot seeder with mechatronic seed feeding device for corn (Zea mays L.) field breeding experiment,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 977, no. 1, p. 012067, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org//10.1088/1755-1315/977/1/012067.

Ansar, Nazaruddin, and A. D. Azis, “Operator Workload Analysis of Corn Seed Planting Equipment in Corn Planting,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Environment, Agriculture and Tourism (ICOSEAT 2022), 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-086-2_72.

O. Oduma, “Effect of Soil Type and Operational Speed on Performance of Some Selected Agricultural Field Machinery in South East Nigeria,” CIGR J., vol. 23, no. 1, 2021.

F. Dai et al., “Optimization of mechanized soil covering path based on the agronomic mode of full-film double-ditch with double-width filming,” Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 139–146, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20221501.6853.

S. F. Hamilton, T. J. Richards, A. P. Shafran, and K. N. Vasilaky, “Farm labor productivity and the impact of mechanization,” Am. J. Agric. Econ., vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1435–1459, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12273.

K. Guler and D. M. Petrisor, “A Pugh Matrix based product development model for increased small design team efficiency,” Cogent Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2021.1923383.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

Issue

Section

Articles